Originally posted by Matt Haverly
I just finished reading the book last night.
Another thing that jumps out at me as I read it is how frequently he recommends reverse sweeps, or reverse "slaps" for many types of illustrated scenarios.
Some people are really resistant to the idea of using any reverse sweep/rudder/brake stroke at all, and recommend a sweep on the right as opposed to a reverse stroke of any kind on the left. The book reinforces an idea that I like - that there is a place for every stroke and much of that has to do with your speed vs. the speed of the current, and what your desired speed is. If I am already going too slow to punch a hole and I need to change boat angle prior to it, I will probably sweep. If I am already in fast water and going faster than the water, I can probably do some type of braking reverse stroke. Although you hear many people demonize any braking strokes of any kind.
Doublepostin' JP style...
I started out in a playboat on the Wenatchee, and for whatever reason I developed the habit of doing a lot of braking/reverse sweep strokes. When I started running more technical rivers in creek boats, I got punished for this bad habit. Traveling slower than the speed of the river is a recipe for all sorts of trouble.
Even though it's not the same as a 'reverse slap' I consider a low brace to often be a bit of a slap. I would encourage your to focus on low bracing over high bracing. It is a much faster stroke to execute, helps you maintain a much more stable position, and is far easier/safer on your shoulders.
At the pool sessions I've been to, it seems like high braces are a really popular thing for people to work on. To use a skiing analogy, it's like leaning back on your skis to save yourself from a wreck. The minute you lean back you're putting yourself into a terrible position for whatever is downhill from you.